Print this page Email this page
Users Online: 76
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 117-120

Eosinophilic cystitis: Report of two cases and review of literature


Department of Urology, Narayana Medical College, Chintareddypalem, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication16-Oct-2014

Correspondence Address:
Chandramohan Godala
Department of Urology, Narayana Medical College, Chintareddypalem, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2278-9596.143092

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Eosinophilic cystitis is a rare but distinct entity in patients presenting with bladder symptoms. We describe two cases of eosinophilic cystitis in whom no specific cause could be found with review of the literature. In one patient, the symptoms and radiological evaluation suggested a bladder tumour. However, transurethral resection of bladder lesion was done and histology revealed eosinophilic cystitis. The other patient presented with lower urinary tract symptoms of long duration and bladder biopsy revealed eosinophilic cystitis. Both patients were managed conservatively with anti-histamines and steroids and they improved well. The evaluation of the patient with eosinophylic cystitis should include cystoscopy and biopsy to establish histological diagnosis. After diagnosis the patients can be safely and successfully treated conservatively although recurrence is not uncommon.

Keywords: Bladder biopsy, bladder tumor, eosinophilic cystitis, lower urinary tract symptoms


How to cite this article:
Bhaskar VG, Vaddi SP, Godala C, Vasanthu VK. Eosinophilic cystitis: Report of two cases and review of literature . Arch Int Surg 2014;4:117-20

How to cite this URL:
Bhaskar VG, Vaddi SP, Godala C, Vasanthu VK. Eosinophilic cystitis: Report of two cases and review of literature . Arch Int Surg [serial online] 2014 [cited 2020 Nov 25];4:117-20. Available from: https://www.archintsurg.org/text.asp?2014/4/2/117/143092


  Introduction Top


Eosinophilic cystitis is a rare inflammatory lesion of the bladder of unknown origin. Brown and Palubinskas first reported the disease in 1960. [1],[2] Until now, only around 200 cases have been reported in the literature. [3] Frequently the disease mimics bladder cancer in clinical, radiographic, and cystoscopic features. The definitive diagnosis can be made only by histopathological examination of biopsy specimens. We present two cases of eosinophilic cystitis; one mimicking bladder cancer and the other presenting with recurrent lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).


  Case Reports Top


Case 1

A 60-year-old female presented with clot retention of the urinary bladder. She had preceding history of frequency, urgency, dribbling of urine, abdominal pain with episodes of hematuria for 1 year. Systemic examination did not reveal any abnormality. Ultrasound revealed thickened bladder wall with hyperechoic lesion arising from the right lateral wall and bilateral hydroureteronephrosis. Abdominal computed tomography revealed circumferential thickening of the bladder wall with bilateral hydroureteronephrosis [Figure 1]. Urine cytology was negative on three consecutive samples. Cystoscopy revealed focal thickening with a sessile lesion in the right lateral wall of the bladder. Transurethral resection of the lesion was done. Histopathology revealed transitional lining epithelium and subepithelial fibrocollagenous tissue showing chronic inflammatory cells predominantly eosinophils [Figure 2]a and [Figure 2]b.
Figure 1: Axial section of computed tomography showing thickened bladder wall in Case 1

Click here to view
Figure 2

Click here to view


Case 2

A 55-year-old male, diabetic and hypertensive, presented with fever, pyuria, storage and voiding lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) for 1 year. Systemic examination was normal. Ultrasound revealed right focal pyelonephritis with bilateral renal parenchymal changes. Repeated urine cultures were negative. Urine polymerase chain reaction for mycobacterial DNA and cytology for malignant cells was negative. Cystoscopy revealed erythematous patches, but no exophytic growth [Figure 3]. Bladder biopsy revealed fibrocollagenous tissue with predominant eosinophillic infiltrates, few macrophages and lymphocytes [Figure 4].
Figure 3: Cystoscopic view of diffuse erythematous lesions in the bladder in Case 2

Click here to view
Figure 4: Histopathology of bladder biopsy in Case 2 showing fibrocollagenous tissue with eosinophills and few macrophages (H and E, ×400)

Click here to view


Both patients commenced therapy with anti-histamines (cetrizine 10 mg/day) and corticosteroids (prednisolone 20 mg/day) for 4 weeks, and they recovered well.


  Discussion Top


Eosinophilic cystitis is a rare condition characterized histologically by eosinophilic infiltration of the submucosa and muscular layer. The acute phase presents with tissue eosinophilia, mucosal edema, hyperemia and muscle necrosis. In the chronic phase eosinophilia is not conspicuous and scarring may be prominent. [3] This disorder can eventually progress to a complete fibrosis of the urinary bladder with secondary involvement of the rest of the urinary tract, resulting in obstructive nephropathy with variable degrees of renal insufficiency. [4]

According to van der Ouden, [5] the most common presenting symptoms are urinary frequency (67%), dysuria (62%), gross or microscopic hematuria (68%), suprapubic pain (49%), and urinary retention (10%). First patient in our study presented with hematuria with clots along with frequency and urgency, whereas the second had both storage and voiding LUTS with pyuria and fever. The etiology of eosinophilic cystitis remains unknown, but it is believed to be associated with injury; drugs including methicillin, warfarin, anthranilic acid, intravesical mitomycin, and thiotepa; bacterial, viral, and parasitic infections; and reactions to food and other allergens. [4] Pathogenesis of eosinophilic cystitis still remains unclear but allergic reactions have been suggested to be more commonly predisposing factors. It could possibly be caused by antigen-antibody reaction leading to production of various immunoglobulins, which in turn cause activation of eosinophils that initiates inflammatory process. [6] We could not identify any such cause of the disease in our patients. Urine analysis of 77% of patients showed hematuria or pyuria. The ratio of positive urine culture was only 20.5%. [7] In eosinophilic cystitis, peripheral blood eosinophilia can be found in 43% of cases and up to 50% of patients will have a history of allergy. [7] Urine cultures in our patients were negative, and peripheral eosinophilia and history of allergy were not present. It usually has a chronic course with periodic recurrences.

Cystoscopy findings may vary considerably with edema, erythema, raised velvety, polypoid, ulcerating to papillary lesions and frankly fungating masses in bladder mucosa. Sometimes an infiltrative mass-like lesion may also be visualized. [8] In our first case cystoscopy showed sessile lesion mimicking bladder tumor in right lateral wall and the second case had erythematous patches all over the bladder. Eosinophilic lesions may present as a diffuse eosinophilic inflammation of the bladder wall without a mass or as a nodular or sessile lesion. Radiographic findings may show variable thickening of the bladder wall, ranging from diffuse or asymmetrical and irregular thickening to mass formation. The pseudotumorous form of eosinophilic cystitis is characterized by extensive infiltration of the bladder wall that may resemble an invasive tumor. In our first case, there was circumferential thickening of bladder with bilateral hydroureteronephrosis and the second case showed features of pyelonephritis. The radiological features are so varied and give no clue to diagnosis.

Diagnosis can only be made by histological examination of a biopsy specimen of the bladder. It is imperative to obtain adequate deep biopsies; otherwise, the diagnosis can be missed. Histologically, the submucosa is edematous, containing a mixed inflammatory infiltrate in which eosinophils are prominent. The hallmark for diagnosis was diffuse infiltration of eosinophils. which was present in both of our cases.

Although treatment for eosinophilic cystitis has not yet been standardized, it mainly involves removal of the allergen or discontinuation of the drug when an allergy is the clear cause. Most of them respond to anti-histamines and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In refractory cases corticosteroids should be added. [9] Our patients responded well to such treatment. The success rate of this therapy reaches 80-100% when on corticosteroids. [9] Transurethral resection of the disorder lesion, immunosuppressive agents, such as cyclosporine can be considered. Around 7% of cases show an aggressive course with recurrent hematuria, impaired renal function and resistance to medical treatment. [6] Only in patients who have a disease intractable to conservative treatments and presenting as profuse hematuria, contracted bladder, distal ureteral involvement partial or total cystectomy, and urinary diversion must be considered. [10]


  Conclusion Top


Eosinophilic cystitis can mimick bladder tumor, carcinoma in situ, genitourinary tuberculosis, interstitial cystitis. High index of suspicion is required to diagnose eosinophilic cystitis. Only histopathology provides the diagnosis and most of the times it can be managed conservatively with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, anti-histamines and steroids. Occasionally, it may lead to serious bladder disease with upper tract deterioration and create a urologic cripple.

 
  References Top

1.
Brown EW. Eosinophilic granuloma of the bladder. J Urol 1960;83:665-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Palubinskas AJ. Eosinophilic cystitis. Case report of eosinophilic infiltration of the urinary bladder. Radiology 1960;75:589-91.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Powell NB, Powell EB, Thomas OC, Queng JT, McGovern JP. Allergy of the lower urinary tract. J Urol 1972;107:631-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Peterson NE. Eosinophilic cystitis. Urology 1985;26:167-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
van den Ouden D. Diagnosis and management of eosinophilic cystitis: A pooled analysis of 135 cases. Eur Urol 2000;37:386-94.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Teegavarapu PS, Sahai A, Chandra A, Dasgupta P, Khan MS. Eosinophilic cystitis and its management. Int J Clin Pract 2005;59:356-60.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Kiliç S, Erguvan R, Ipek D, Gökçe H, Güneº A, Aydin NE, et al . Eosinophilic cystitis. A rare inflammatory pathology mimicking bladder neoplasms. Urol Int 2003;71:285-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Devasia A, Kekre NS, Date A, Pandey AP, Gopalakrishnan G. Eosinophilic cystitis - Not that uncommon! Scand J Urol Nephrol 1999;33:396-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Motzkin D. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of eosinophilic cystitis. J Urol 1990;144:1464-6.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Lin HY, Chou YH, Wu WJ, Huang CH, Chai CY. Eosinophilic cystitis: Eight cases report and literature review. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2002;18:30-4.  Back to cited text no. 10
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Case Reports
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2408    
    Printed43    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded145    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal