Print this page Email this page
Users Online: 29
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 72-77

Two-port and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Differences in outcome


Department of Surgery, Shri Maharaja Hari Singh Hospital, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India

Correspondence Address:
Muddassir Shahdhar
Department of Surgery, Shri Maharaja Hari Singh Hospital, Srinagar - 190 001, Jammu and Kashmir
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2278-9596.143082

Rights and Permissions

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has several advantages over open cholecystectomy. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome between two-port and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients and Methods: Between October 2011 and September 2013, 200 patients with calculous cholecystitis were prospectively consecutively selected into two groups of 100 patients each for two-port and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, respectively. Results: There were 39 males and 161 females. The mean operative time required in the two-port group was 46.66 ± 14.47 minutes and in four-port group was 48.79 ± 8.336 minutes (P value = 0.1297). Three patients were converted to four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the two-port group. There were 25 minor complications (14 in the two-port group and 11 in the four-port group). The VAS scores were statistically significant at 1, 12, and 24 hours. An average requirement of 0.73 doses of analgesia in the two-port group and 1.36 doses in the four-port cohort was observed. The hospital stay was significantly shorter in the two-port group. Conclusion: The two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and preferable due to fewer requirements of analgesics, better cosmesis, cost-effectiveness, shorter hospital stay, and reduced labor.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2445    
    Printed48    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded237    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal