Print this page Email this page
Users Online: 257
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 1-6

Surgical outcome of stapled and handsewn anastomosis in lower gastrointestinal malignancies: A prospective study


1 Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Sanjeev Bansal Cygnus Hospital, Karnal, Haryana, India
3 Department of Internal Medicine, Sher e Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Jammu and Kashmir, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Waseem Raja Dar
Sanjeev Bansal Cygnus Hospital, Railway Road, Karnal - 132 001, Haryana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2278-9596.187193

Rights and Permissions

Background: In spite of the wide range of intestinal anastomotic techniques, surgeons are still not so confident with colorectal anastomosis. Invention of surgical staplers has provided some procedural advantages and sense of security to surgeons as well as to patients, in respect to sphincter-saving procedures and thereby improving the quality of life. Outcome measures of applying these devices should be evaluated to see its efficacy and cost-effectiveness over conventional handsewn technique in treatment plan. The result of such comparative study may help surgeons to improve results of their technique. The aim of this prospective study is to observe the results of using stapler in comparison to handsewn colorectal anastomosis. Patients and Methods: A total of 60 patients were selected, of which 30 underwent “stapled” and 30 underwent “handsewn” anastomosis. The two groups were compared on the following points (i) mean operating time (min), (ii) resumption of oral feeding, (iii) wound infection rate, (iv) anastomotic leak rate, (v) duration of hospital stay and return to work in days. The procedures were evaluated and presented. Results: The stapling procedure took shorter operative time compared to the handsewn anastomosis with a mean of 123 ± 21.1 min and 161.5 ± 27.8 min respectively (P < 0.001). Oral feeding was started earlier in patients who underwent stapler anastomosis 4.0 ± 1.0 days, as compared to handsewn anastomosis 5.0 ± 0.83 days (P value = 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in postoperative hospital stay; it was 7.8 ± 1.76 days and in controls group it was 8.1 ± 2.12 (P > 0.0137). Conclusion: Application of the stapler in treating lower gastrointestinal malignancies demonstrated better effects in terms of mean operating time, resumption of oral feeds, and hospital stay.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3829    
    Printed71    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded375    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal